|
By The Editorial Board Of The New York TimesSaving UkraineThe United States
and Europe may finally be
ready to put some real
emergency aid on the table as part
of an effort
to resolve the political crisis
in Ukraine and to tie
the country more closely to
the West. Without such an
offer of financial support, Russia will continue
to have leverage
to bully Ukraine into its
geopolitical orbit. The standoff over
economic policy and whether Ukraine
will ally with Europe or
Russia is more than two months
old and has led
to violent protests in which
at least six people were killed. Details of the
aid package are still under
negotiation in Europe and the
United States, but there should
be little doubt about the
need. Ukraine’s economy is on
the brink of failure and
its politics has been in
turmoil since the president, Viktor Yanukovych, rejected an economic
pact with Europe in favor
of an offer
from Russia for $15 billion in assistance. Russia, playing hardball after Mr. Yanukovych announced plans to replace his
cabinet to appease protesters, last week suspended
a portion of the aid and
thus left an opening for
the Americans and Europeans to
make their own offer. The Western package
is mainly intended as bridge
financing to get a new Ukrainian
government, if one is formed,
through a transition period so it
can make the sufficient reforms needed to qualify for
a long-delayed loan from the International
Monetary Fund. The West is
looking for a government of experts,
possibly led by an opposition
leader. There is undoubtedly
risk because it is not
at all clear
that Mr. Yanukovych and the opposition can find any
basis for real compromise, or, if they
do, make it work over
the long term. But the
West needs to be even
more committed than Russia in
offering Ukraine a compelling path forward. And it
needs to move quickly. Catherine
Ashton, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, told The
Wall Street Journal over the
weekend that the package could
include not just money but
loan guarantees, investment and currency stabilization. In the past
two weeks, Vice President Joseph Biden Jr.;
Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany;
and José Manuel Barroso, the president of
the European Commission, the European Union’s executive body, have been in
daily and rotating contact with Mr. Yanukovych. It was reassuring
to hear Secretary
of State John Kerry tell
a security conference in Munich over
the weekend that “nowhere is
the fight for a democratic, European future more important today than in
Ukraine” and to affirm that
the United States and Europe
“stand with the people of
Ukraine in that fight.” That
will mean providing the parties
in Ukraine with whatever mediation
and support might be useful. During the Munich
conference, Mr. Kerry met with
Ukrainian opposition leaders as did
the German foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Diplomatic contacts are essential.
But as long
as the situation
remains volatile, with the potential
for all-out civil war, the
West must also be prepared
to impose sanctions on any
party that uses force but
especially the government. The Obama administration has already revoked
the visas of some Ukrainian
officials and is preparing other sanctions if needed. The Europeans have
been far more reluctant to threaten penalties,
although, on Tuesday, Mr. Steinmeier
raised the possibility of sanctions. Ukraine, one of
the most important countries to emerge from
the former Soviet Union, is
at a critical point. Mr. Yanukovych’s
grip on power
is slipping, yet, even after
offering the opposition some concessions, he is still playing
for time under the sway
of Russian and Ukrainian hard-liners. The opposition
also needs to negotiate seriously
on a way out of the
current turmoil. February, 4, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/ |