|
Taras VoznyakGiovanni Battista Piranesi-memories of the future «E quindi uscimmo a riveder le
stelle» Dante Alighieri,
1265-1321 Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778) is
one of the key figures of the XVIII century, the age of Enlightenment.However,
he is known as one of the greatest engravers, particularly in the veduta genre
- urban landscape.The contribution of Piranesi to the culture of the eighteenth
century, the century of the brilliant agony Ancien Régime, and the
development of enlightenment thought was much more complex and multifaceted
than the role of a brilliant and financially successful ethicist.He managed to
prove himself not only as an engraver but also as an architect, theorist,
restorer, collector, archaeologist, but also a thinker who not only
comprehended but also shaped the spirit of the era. Piranesi is a Son of the
Enlightenment, he combined encyclopedic knowledge, intellectual freedom
and creative imagination. He has always been in a state of creative and
intellectual pursuit. And it is not surprised. The epoch itself
was a constant pursuit.Old forms of social structure, intellectual trends, and
economic relations began to sharply dissociate themselves with the new
realities of the European-centered world. But not everyone felt it.Therefore,
the XVIII century something resembles a ballet in the time of the plague. It is
no doubt true, that the symbol of this brilliant agony was Jeanne Antoinette
Poisson, Marquise de Pompadour, (1721-1764) - the favorite of the French King
Louis XV Le Bien Aimé, (1710-1774). Their head had to be shaved on the
guillotine during the final collapse - Ancien Régime - the old order ,
but not losers Marie Antoinette, Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna von
Habsburg-Lothringen,( 1755-1793) and Louis XVI, (1754-1793), , who paid for not
understanding of the main trends of that time. This was the time of scientific
interpretation of history, its philosophical analysis and comprehension. There
was a stormy search for new ways of the development of society, adapting the
world order to the requirements of that
time.In the eyes of a new man dumped a shell of almost medieval
relationships.There was a free man who could not accept the limitations of the
feudal society, which ended up to the end. The Enlightenment began in the second half
of the XVII century and lasted until the French Revolution. The search were in different realms and in
different directions. Philosophers, politicians, entrepreneurs looked out the
future. Someone rested on himself the "perfect" past, which was the
interpretation as a certain perfect
state of human society and man.Someone went even further and rested on himself
the "perfect" nature, which he interpreted as a certain perfect state
of human society and man - such a lost Paradise. Someone was looking for a
support in the mystical insight or humanized religion. In France educational rationalism was dominated
,which considered that the main goal of the society is human happiness,the path
to which - the reorganization of society in accordance with the principles
dictated by the mind, were adherents of the theory of natural law. It was this
that generated the idea of progress, positive, rational development - the
consistent development of mankind through the acquisition of new knowledge,
improvement of the social system and improvement of living conditions. The
leaders of these ideas in France were Paul Heinrich Dietrich Baron von Holbach,
(1723-1789), Denis Diderot, (1713-1784),Jean Le Rond D’ Alembert, (1717-1783),
Claude Adrien Helvétius, (1715- 1771),Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron
de La Brède et de Montesquieu, (1689-1755),Voltaire, François
Marie Arouet, (1694-1778). In England, enlightening rationalism tended
to pragmatism, empiricism, which became a special feature of the Anglo-Saxon
world. The leaders of these ideas in England were Thomas Hobbes, (1588-1679),
John Locke,( 1632-1704), David Hume, (1711-1776) and Isaac Newton, (1642-1727). Instead, in the shredded German lands in the
Enlightenment sufficed borrowed from the
French rationalism, and also typically for Germans sentimentality and mysticism.The leaders of
the Enlightenment in Germany were Friedrich Schiller, (1759-1805), Gotthold
Ephraim Lessing, (1729- 1781), Immanuel Kant, (1724-1804) and of course Johann
Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832). During the era of Enlightenment the public life emerged.The
essential issues of society began to be discussed in the press, which was then
born, discussion clubs, salons, in assemblies, and, importantly, in cafes. But
also in the Masonic lodges, which in the XVIII century have gained their
heyday. In different European countries the
Academies began to form.The example for them became The Royal Society of London
for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge, 1662. Honestly, it was a high Masonic
lodge, which united thinkers, scientists, researchers of nature and the world.
In France, appeared the French Academy of Science(Académie des sciences,
1666). In German was the Prussian
Academy of Sciences (Preußische
Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1700). As we can notice, the part of the
Enlightenment was the movement of f Freemasonry, the world order, which set
itself the goal of changing society by influencing it on the power bodies and
statesmen, as changing or "building" the person himself - members of
his lodges.A lot of prominent figures of this era belonged to this movement.
Among them are Montesquieu, Voltaire, Alexander Pope (1688-1744), Wolfgang
Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791), Goethe, Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), George
Washington (George Washington, 1732-1799) and even the kings and the Friedrich
II von Hohenzollern (1712-1786). And what about Italy? In fact, then, Italy
was only a territory, and not a state, a territory with a distinct, somewhat
provincial, but at the same time a place of pilgrimage - especially a cultural
pilgrimage. It was a huge ruin of old Rome and the treasury of the Italian Renaissance.
The specificity of the Italian Enlightenment - the network - was its special,
vividly national character. At the beginning of the eighteenth century in
Italy, the educational mood broke out for itself, speaking at times in the most
unexpected forms for pan-European context and spreading channels that were not
characteristic of other countries. Journalistic studies were followed
(scientific newspapers and magazines were published), scientific and literary
associations worked, for example, the Academy of Arcadia (Accademia
dell'Arcadia, 1690) and its branches throughout the country, whose members were
Giovanni Mario Crescimbeni, 1663-1728), Gian Vincenzo Gravina (1664-1718),
Ludovico Antonio Muratori (1672-1750). In Italy, the leaders of the Enlightenment
were Giambattista Vico (1668-1744), Caesar Beccaria (1738-1794), Pietro Verri
(1728-1797), Vittorio Alfieri, 1749-1803), but also Giovanni Battista
Piranesi.Well, of course, whole bunch of different kinds of semi-thinkers,
semi-freemasons, semi charlatans, such as Alessandro Cagliostro, Giuseppe
Balsamo, 1743-1795) - fun libertines and
pseudoscientists - at least they were funny guys. Piranesi realized the need for knowledge in
the field of cultural and historical development of previous epochs. He always
remembered his educational mission, Piranesi focused on future generations, and
his works gave impetus to artistic ideas that could be realized in the future.
That is why the personality of Piranesi is of interest as the most striking
example in European art, which manifests the characteristic features of the
Enlightenment. For the XVIII century was characterized by a
special interest in the historical past (the idealized era of ancient Rome,
Greece, natural, Paradise, etc.),which is reflected in the work of Piranesi. He
constantly turned to national traditions, especially Italian art of different
periods. The creativity of Piranesi was characterized by bold innovation,
fearlessness in the offer of new ideas. Piranesi said that he would have been
mad enough to embark on a plan of a new universe.We can notice it in a secret
form in its conductors because it is a
hint of the direction where the humanity
should "return" - to the ancient, full of glory, order and prosperity
of the Roman era. However, the definition of "return to the ancient Roman
era" is very general. Of course, the artist can restrict himself to this
general reference - for that he is an artist. However, we can, from a distance
of time, already see these queries more discursively. Thinkers of the Enlightenment went in three
ways: By way of rationalism. Man was offered to
change himself through the comprehension of a new entity for himself - the
essence of rational.And here for the first time appeared the concept of
progress, development - both man and society. And at the same time society,
social relations should be rationalized as well as thinking of a human.
Firstly, everything that was in the world needed to be properly named and
systematized. That is why systemic sciences developed so rapidly. Then put
these proper names and systems in the minds of people. The Enlightenment
thinkers attempted to create a rational, intelligent environment for a person,
and rationalize its world. It is understandable that the reformation of human
society was a proposal by Voltaire, Diderot, Montesquieu. Moreover, it is
necessary to rationalize its environment, an architectonic environment in
which person lives.Because the new man
was increasingly losing touch with nature, pastoral, and more and more used in
the car-for-life - the urban landscape. Nevertheless, this way was to
"build" a person from inside through its rationalization. By naturalization. At the same time, the
person was offered to "return" to his natural, natural state, the primary
"Paradise", which a person lost due to distorted socialization (read
urbanization).It was suggested to return to the natural environment of a
person, to the virgin forest, lost Paradise, and so in fact to the pastor,
which dreamy ladies loved. It was also
promoted by Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). Perfecting the primitive
society, Rousseau contrasted the contemporary social system to a happy life in
the so-called "natural state", when all the people, in his opinion,
were equal and free. Rousseau's proposal was to "build" a person from
the outside - through a return to the "natural state", on the bosom
of nature, to the primitive society. But there was a third way.It was discussed
by free masonries in their Academies and lodges.They combined the "building"
of a person from within through improvements in the Academies, schools and
lodges, and from the outside - through the equalization of all people, through
the expansion of the field of freedom. Freemasonry was not limited to rationalism,
pragmatism, agnosticism, atheism, or a single religion or denomination - it
accepted everything, even an educational faith in the Great Creator of the
Universe. And what about Piranesi?In line with the
spirit of the era, he also modeled the world of his people in his veduta. Did
he really reproduce the ruins of "lost Paradise" - ancient Rome? Yes
and no. In fact, he, like everyone else, modeled the "Rome of the
Future". Giovanni Battista Piranesi modeled the ideal, classical,
architectonic, but also social spaces for the future man. Two main important dates in his life
the birth (1720) and the death (1778)
nearly had to limit his influence. The frames of the Enlightenment era were
somewhat wider (the preconditions of the Enlightenment epoch appeared at the beginning
of the XVIII century), and secondly, the "era of Piranesi" did not
end with the death of the master, his artistic ideas continued to exist in the
work of the masters of the XIX and even the XX century. He has expanded such
architectonic and social spatial resolution for people that are still relevant. For example, the
contemporary remixes by Robert Venturi, (1925-2018) ,where he compared Las
Vegas to Rome Piranesi. Who else in Italy has modeled next to him
these spaces of the future? Thinkers-enlighteners - yes. Clerics - no.
Aristocrats - either not. First of all, Giambattista Vico, who is the founder of the theory of historical
cycles, the psychology of peoples and the comparative method of historical
knowledge. In his philosophical writings, Vico set himself the task of
presenting a coherent picture of the world - its past, present and future on
the basis of the doctrine of the development of human society in the form of
repetitive cycles, the constant renewal of mankind, the movement from decay to
regeneration. It should be mentioned that Vico especially distinguished Rome as
a cultural-historical phenomenon - this is typical for the Italian
Enlightenment. Therefore, Rome was so much admired by Piranesi. However, despite the fact that his patron
was the representative of Ancien Régime Étienne François
de Choiseul, (1719-1785) , who visited
Rome and the environment was more modest, and at the same time more ambitious.
The circle of communication of Piranesi consisted of representatives of
different spheres of art, who fell under the magic talent of a great Italian.It
is understandable , that "Venetian architect" primarily affected
architects. To recall at least the influence that Piranesi had on Robert Adam
(1728-1792) , who was the Scottish architect of the dynasty of the Palladians
Adam, the most famous representative of the British classicism of the XVIII
century. He was one of the founders of neoclassicism in English architecture.
But the most interesting of these acquaintances is that Adam was a prominent
member of the Royal Society of London, and the Edinburgh Royal Society - the
official form of the highest lodges of England and Scotland. As a friend of Piranesi,
Robert Adam wrote about him: "The impressive and brilliant imaginations
that he managed to embody in various forms of temples, palaces, is the most
unusual source of inspiration and creativity that can only be imagined for any
amateur of architecture." The style of Robert Adam himself was formed by
the study and comprehension of the works of Piranesi. In his book Ruins of the
Palace of the Emperor DoikJetian at Spalato (1764), Adam argued that interior
decoration in the Roman style became a model for contemporary architect. Not only Robert Adam, but Sir William
Chambers (1723-1796), Sir John Soane (1753-1837) used the motives of Piranesi. William Chambers during his stay in Italy
from 1750 to 1755, like Adam, fell under the influence of Piranesi. His major
construction was Somerset House (1776-1796) - a huge administrative and
government building in London. The Somerset House directly resembles the
Piranesi engravings, for example, from the collection «Vedute di Roma» (1778). The
series of Piranesi "Le Antichita Romane" - the designs of ancient
bridges significantly influenced Scottish architect Robert Mylne (1733-1811) -
it is about his project of the London Bridge, the kind of which was in 1764
depicted by Piranesi in the drawing of the author "A view of part of the
intended bridge at Blackfriars "in London. Instead, another mason John Soane tried to
create, in his words, "poetic architecture."In 1778, Soane met
Piranesi. In London, replicating Piranesi, Soane built the Freemasons' Hall,
(1828-1831). It was an architectonic and social
construction of the world in Masonic style. Was Piranesi a freemasson? Maybe was or
maybe not. Maybe he just communicated with them. They were mainly Englishmen,
Scots and Frenchmen, and his friends, and his customers. Moreover, he designed an English cafe in Piazza di
Spagna in Rome and he turned to Egyptian antiquity, to the Egyptian
architectonics. In essence,he created fashion.Thus, long before the Napoleon’s
military expeditions to Egypt, Piranesi managed to turn interest in the far
Egyptian civilization, becoming a forerunner of the process of the development
of Egyptology. Where is this from? Of course, the freemasons, who also stylized
their rituals in the ancient Egyptian style. And he not only stylized, but also
sought in that ancient Egyptian any transient truths. However, with free thinking in Italy was not
easy. In the XVIII century. Italy really was only a geographical concept with
different jurisdictions and limited freedom. Initially, the Enlightenment did
not meet the resistance. Lodges were opened in Florence, then in Livorno, in
the Naples Kingdom, then in Milan, in the Republic of Venice, in the papal
ecclesiastical state, in Rome. As a rule, they were founded by foreigners and the
rituals were English or French. In Italian lodges gathered Catholics,
Protestants, and Jews.And it from the church’s point of view was a heresy. In
addition, their members were educators, rationalists, deists and agnostics. So
Clemens PP. XII; Lorenzo Corsini, 1652-1740), a weak, sick, almost blind,
signed in 1738 prepared by the Papal bull - bull "In eminenti". With
it he cursed freemasons , just as his predecessors once cursed the Jansenites.
Now, of course, this curse is taken off. This has affected the public atmosphere. In
Italian territories freemasons, and behind them and all other enlighteners,
were forced to go underground. Enlighteners, rationalists, atheists or deists
had to conceal, hide, stay in the shadows. Not for long, of course. Everything
changed with the French Revolution. Fresh wind began to blow. But Piranesi
didn’t see it, however he foretold this changes already. This reaction was reflected in the scaring
cycle of Piranesi «Capricci di Carceri»
(1749-1759) - "Prisons" or
"Dungeons". We know two periods of life and work of Piranesi -
Venetian (1720-1740) and Roman (1740-1778). Venice is one of the centers for the spread
of educational culture, where in the eighteenth century many representatives of
the enlightened intelligentsia lived and worked - Scipione Maffei (1675-1755),
Carlo Lodoli (1690-1761), Francesco Algarotti, 1712-1764). Rome at the beginning of the XVIII century -
a thriving artistic capital, the center of culture and art - one of the main
European centers of the Enlightenment - the main and final point of the Grand
Tour - a great journey to Europe, which was carried out by almost all educated
representatives of the age of the Enlightenment. The teacher of Soane since 1759 was a mason
George Dance, (1695-1768) and had a six-year architecture course in Rome. The
Newgate Prison (1768-1780), built by him in London (demolished in 1902) with
heavy chain garlands above the entrance gate, caused the same horror as the
fantastic "Prisons" of Piranesi in his series «Capricci di Carceri»,
with whom Dance met in Rome. And here we notice not only the bright side
of the creativity of Piranesi, but also it’s dark side. "Capricci di
Carceri" has shown the disappointment of the aging and disappointed
Piranesi - to build a new man and a new society was not so easy. Even not
looking at the greatness of the endlessly depicted buildings and ruins of the
majestic Rome, Rome, which he himself imagined. Labyrinths of Dungeons better reflected the real state of the
Italian, and not only Italian societies. He did not see the greatness of the
Great and Bloody French Revolution. A new and majestic was born in this bloody
whirlwind. Napoléon I Bonaparte, (1769-1821), is an Italian too also
provincial, carried out what Piranesi was talking about in his veduta. It was
Napoleon who made the imperial Roman style a reality - in every detail - from
fashion, furniture, architecture, to imperial Roman eagles. In the Piranesi Printmaking contemporary
architects found the basis for the projects of buildings of superhuman size,
following Piranesi, a clear propensity to gigantomania. For example, the French
architect (Marie-Joseph Peyre, 1730-1785) followed this megalomania, which from
1753 to 1756 studied at the French Academy in Rome. His main goal was to
create a new monumental architecture in
the spirit of "heroic neoclassicism", which arose from the ancient
"prototypes" of Piranesi. Two French architects Étienne-Louis
Boullée, (1728-1799) and Claude Nicolas Ledoux, (1736-1806) also
followed Piranesi gigantomania. Made by Claude Nicolas Ledoux, projects in
the spirit of "heroic neoclassicism" of the revolutionary era in
France resembled antique buildings. And his project of an ideal city or utopia
- de l'utopie de la Ville de Chaux in the plan is similar to the letter
"Ichnographia" from the collection of Piranesi "Il Campo Marzio
del Antica Roma" (1762). Executed by Étienne-Louis Boullée,
the project of the museum (1783) resembles the Vesti temple from the works of
Piranesi "Prima Parte di Architettura, e Prospettive" (1747). The age of the Enlightenment was full of
utopian ideas, which was also reflected in the collection of Piranesi "Il
Campo Marzio del Antica Roma", which looks like a sort of phantasmagoria,
but it was in this collection that Piranese proposed the ideal model for a new
city. He expressed his nostalgia for a dreamy future and never realized “ new
Rome” in the collection Vedute di Roma (1778). The monumentality of the Doristic style of
the Temples of Paestum has become a dominant example in the environments of
German architects such as Friedrich David Gilly (1772-1800), Karl Friedrich
Schinkel (1781-1841), Leo von Klenze, 1784-1864). The monumentality of the Doristic style of
the Paestum Temple became a dominant example in the environments of German
architects such as Friedrich David Gilly (1772-1800), Karl Friedrich Schinkel
(1781-1841), Leo von Klenze, 1784-1864). Thus Giovanni Battista Piranesi was the
creator of the future from the past. And not only in the sense of his
architectural proposals or fantasies, but also in the sense of his direct
participation in the creation of a new world. It seems that his graphics should
change the world, humanize and rationalize it, but also a human ,who would live
in the changed architectonic and social
world. Did he succeed? To the end, of course, no. "And here we went out to
see the light again"-Giacomo Girolamo Casanova, (1725-1798) finished the fifteenth chapter of «Histoire de ma
vie»-the history of his life. The next chapter begins with the phrase: "I
am coming out of dungeon." The End “Hell” Giacomo Girolamo Casanova was in
Rome. But the times have changed. Giovanni Battista Piranesi made a
contribution that the world and a human today are as they are. October 8, 2018, Lviv |